Allod Book a call

Allod — on-premises AI, leased

We rack an AI datacenter in your building.
You own the weights.

Small task-specific models, trained every night on your own accepted and corrected work, running on hardware we deliver and operate on your floor. The training data never leaves the building. No query touches a closed model provider. One fixed monthly fee.

Book a deployment call See the training loop

Lease
Fixed monthly. Hardware, platform, and training in one line.
Egress
None. Outbound-only update channel, metrics-only telemetry.
Weights
Customer-owned. Perpetual, including after the term.
You supply
Space and power. Nothing else.

The stalemate

Regulated institutions are not locked out of AI by capability. They are locked out by their own data policy.

The thing that would work

On a narrow, repeated workflow, a small model trained on that workflow's own history beats a general frontier model called through an API. Not marginally. It has seen your exceptions, your house style, your precedent, and the specific ways your people correct a wrong answer. It also runs at a fraction of the energy and a fraction of the cost, on hardware that fits in one rack.

Why you cannot build it

Training it means putting proprietary workflow data — credit files, charts, case records — into a model provider's pipeline. Your policy forbids it. In most cases your regulator forbids it. And the provider is a company that may compete with you in three years, whose retention terms you do not control and cannot audit from the outside.

So the institutions with the most valuable proprietary data are the ones least able to train on it. That is a stalemate, and it is not a capability problem. It is an architecture problem, and it has an architectural answer: put the hardware, the data, and the weights in the same building, and make sure that building is yours.

What we install

Hardware, spec'd and delivered on a pallet, racked by us, operated by us.

Space and power are the two binding long-term constraints on AI. Compute gets cheaper every year; megawatts and square metres do not. You already have both, which is the part of this that is genuinely hard, and it is already paid for.

Single-node deployment — scope of supply
Item Specification Supplied by
Compute node 8 accelerators, ~640 GB accelerated memory, NVMe local store Allod
Enclosure One 42U rack. Locking front and rear doors, tamper-evident seals. Allod
Network Isolated VLAN. One outbound-only path. No inbound route exists. Allod
Installation Delivery, racking, power-on, burn-in, workflow bring-up on site. Allod
Operation Monitoring, nightly training, gating, hot-swap, spares, on-site service. Allod
Floor space One rack footprint plus service clearance. Slab or raised floor. Customer
Power ≈10 kW continuous, 208 V three-phase, A+B feeds to the rack. Customer
Cooling ≈34,000 BTU/h removed at the rack. Standard hot/cold aisle is fine. Customer

Final configuration is sized to the workload after a one-day survey. Accelerator count and memory are the two figures that move; the rack, the power envelope, and the boundary do not.

From signed order to first workflow in production is eight to twelve weeks, and most of that is hardware lead time and your change-control calendar, not us. Install itself is two days on site. We do not need a network drop into your production environment, a VPN into our office, or an account on any of your systems.

The loop

The loop is the product. The rack is just what it runs on.

Every workflow we deploy is instrumented from day one. The model gets better because your people are already correcting it, and those corrections are the most valuable training signal in your organization. Today they are thrown away.

  1. 01

    Run

    In building

    The workflow runs in production against real cases. Every request and every response is written to a local store on the node.

  2. 02

    Capture

    In building

    Each output is instrumented for outcome: accepted as-is, rejected outright, or corrected by the person doing the work. The correction is the signal — it is the label a frontier provider cannot buy.

  3. 03

    Train

    In building

    At 02:00 local, a LoRA adapter trains on that day's accepted, rejected, and corrected pairs. It runs on the same node, on idle capacity, on your power.

  4. 04

    Gate

    In building

    The candidate adapter is scored against your evaluation set — your cases, your rubric, your acceptance threshold. An adapter that does not beat the incumbent is discarded. There is no override.

  5. 05

    Swap

    In building

    A passing adapter is hot-swapped into the serving path without restarting the model. Every version is retained on the node; reverting to any prior adapter is a single command.

  6. 06

    Measure

    In building

    The week-over-week delta on your eval set is recorded and reported. If the number stops moving, we say so — that is a finding about the workflow, not something to hide.

  7. Back to 01. The cycle repeats every night. No station in it is reachable from outside your building, and no data in it leaves.

Measured

A small model in the loop, against a frontier API, on the same workflow.

Credit operations — covenant exception triage. Both systems saw the same cases and were scored against the same frozen evaluation set, held by the customer and never used for training.

Placeholder figures — benchmark not yet published

Benchmark results

Covenant exception triage · n = 000 adjudicated cases · frozen eval set
Measure Frontier API Allod, week 1 Allod, week 8
Agreement with adjudicator 00.0% 00.0% 00.0%
Material breaches missed 00 00 00
Officer corrections per 100 memos 00 00 00
p95 latency 0,000 ms 000 ms 000 ms
Cost per 1,000 memos $00.00 $0.00 $0.00

Method

  • Evaluation set frozen before week 1 and held by the customer. No adapter was trained on any case in it.
  • Ground truth is the adjudicated decision of two senior credit officers, blind to which system produced the memo.
  • The frontier baseline is a current top-tier API model with the same prompt, the same retrieved context, and the same output schema. It was not handicapped.
  • Cost is the fully loaded figure: for Allod, the monthly lease amortized over actual volume, not marginal compute.
  • Single customer, single workflow. This is one result, not a claim about all workflows. We will say the same about the second one.

Ownership

You own the weights.

Not a license to use them. Not access for the term. Ownership, perpetual, including after you stop paying us.

  • Scope The base model as deployed, every LoRA adapter trained on your data, every intermediate checkpoint, and the evaluation set. Exported in safetensors, with the serving container and the eval harness.
  • Derivation Adapters trained on your data are your derivative work, contractually and in fact. We take no license to them, we hold no copy outside your building, and we cannot — the training run happened on your node.
  • On termination Export happens before the hardware is collected, and you sign that you have it. There is no key we hold back, no runtime that expires, and no call home that has to succeed for the model to load.
  • What we keep The steel, and the platform software that we lease to every customer. Not one byte of your data and not one weight trained on it.

Security posture

There is no egress. That is a property of the network, not a promise in a contract.

Data residency

Prompts, retrieved context, outputs, corrections, and training data are written to local storage on the node and never leave it. There is no replication target outside the building.

Update channel

Outbound-only. The node pulls signed artifacts from a fixed endpoint and verifies them against a key pinned at install. Nothing outside can open a connection inward.

Telemetry

Metrics only — utilization, temperature, error counts, adapter version, gate pass/fail. Never prompt content, never output content, never a record identifier. The schema is fixed and published.

Air-gapped mode

Supported. The update channel is disabled entirely and artifacts arrive on physical media against a published hash. Roughly a quarter of prospects choose this.

Read the security architecture

Written to be forwarded to third-party risk without editing.

Where this lands first

Three verticals, because that is where the data is both valuable and immovable.

Banking

Covenant exception triage

A credit officer reads a borrower's quarterly financials against the covenant schedule, decides whether a breach is technical or material, and drafts the exception memo. The judgment is in the bank's own precedent — thousands of prior exceptions, none of them public, none of them in any frontier model's training set.

Healthcare

Prior authorization packet assembly

Assembling the clinical justification a specific payer accepts for a specific procedure code, from the chart. What each payer accepts is learned from that hospital's own approvals and denials. Every input is PHI and none of it can be sent anywhere.

Government

Records request redaction review

First-pass exemption marking on a records release, applying the agency's own long-standing reading of each exemption. The corpus is the agency's prior releases and withholding logs. Much of it is unclassified but not public, and it cannot go to a commercial API.

What it costs

One line item, one number, every month.

The lease covers the hardware, the platform, the nightly training, the gating, the spares, and on-site service. There is no separate license, no per-seat charge, no per-token charge, and no professional services line for the install. A workflow that runs ten times as often next quarter does not cost more.

You provide space and power. Those are real costs and we will not pretend otherwise — roughly 10 kW continuous per node, on your meter.

A typical single-node deployment is a mid-five-figure monthly line item. The range is driven by node configuration, number of workflows, and service level, and we will give you the number on the first call rather than after three.

Book a deployment call

Objections

The five questions we actually get.

What happens if we stop paying?

The lease ends and we collect the hardware. You keep the weights — base model, every adapter you trained, every checkpoint — exported to disk in safetensors format before the rack leaves the building, along with the serving container and the eval harness. They run on any comparable hardware without us. Nothing phones home and nothing expires. The thing we take back is steel.

How do updates reach an isolated box?

One outbound-only channel. The node polls a fixed endpoint on a schedule you set, over a path your firewall allows in one direction. It pulls signed artifacts — platform updates, base model updates, security patches — verifies the signature against a public key pinned at install, and stages them for your approval. Nothing outside your building can initiate a connection inward, because there is no inbound route to initiate it on. If you prefer, we disable the channel entirely and deliver updates on physical media against a published hash. That is air-gapped mode and roughly a quarter of prospects want it.

What if the hardware fails?

It is our hardware and our problem. We hold spares for every field-replaceable part in the node and swap on a next-business-day target, faster where the site warrants it. The lease covers it; there is no separate maintenance line. A failed accelerator degrades throughput, it does not stop the workflow — the model keeps serving on the remaining cards. Adapters and training data live on the node's local store, which is mirrored, and the weights are yours in either case.

How is this different from buying GPUs ourselves?

Buying the hardware is the easy quarter of the problem. The hard parts are the training loop and the gate: instrumenting a live workflow so accepted, rejected, and corrected outputs are captured cleanly, turning that into a nightly LoRA run that does not degrade the model, and building an evaluation set honest enough that you can let a new adapter into production on its say-so. That is a standing team you would have to hire, and most of that team's work has nothing to do with your business. We lease you the hardware and that team as one line item. You can also just buy GPUs from us in effect — take the hardware, decline the loop — but then you have bought a rack, and the rack is not the product.

What is the smallest deployment you will sell?

One node, one workflow. That is the unit. We will not sell a half-node or a shared node, because the entire argument is that the hardware is yours and nothing else runs on it. One node comfortably carries several workflows once the first is in production, and most customers add the second and third within two quarters. If you want to test the loop before committing a rack, we run a six-week paid pilot on a node we install and then remove — same architecture, same boundary, same gate.

Book a deployment call

Tell us the workflow. We will tell you on the call whether it is a fit.

Thirty minutes, an engineer on the line, no deck. If your workflow is wrong for this — too varied, too low-volume, no correction signal — we will say so on that call rather than sell you a rack.

Free-mail domains are not accepted.

Volume per day, who does it today, and what "correct" means. Two sentences is enough.